If the Moon was made of cheese, would you buy it?

SpaceX’s S-1 tells a story that you should

With SpaceX completing the largest IPO in history – by a wide margin – the power of storytelling and positioning has never been more critical as a company prepares to list. Beyond the galactic aspirations of the business – a $28.5 trillion TAM, SpaceX’s filing is the picture of selling a story and an opportunity to investors and the public alike. With three unique business units that appear adjacent at best, Frankenstein-ed at worst, the company is sewing together its engineering pioneer legacy (rockets), cash-generating competitive advantage (Starlink) and its unparalleled aspirations (Mars, Data centers in space, AI, terrestrial transportation) – coining it “the infrastructure of the future.”

And yes, the S-1 contains the requisite financial performance, corporate governance, risk factors (we’ll touch on these) and other standard, procedural disclosures. However, what stands out about SpaceX’s filing is that the power of the story is paramount, dominating  the prospectus. It’s a storytelling and messaging endeavor unlike any other. And in that there is much to glean for communications teams.

Naming a market segment that doesn’t exist

In encapsulating its business as “building the infrastructure of the future,” the company is effectively using vernacular that is both accessible and acceptable while describing a business that is far-fetched for some and a challenge to model for investors. In anchoring the story in language that people understand, the company introduces the $28.5 trillion TAM that is shocking yet somehow not, given the engineering, first-mover and competitive advantages it holds. Backing this up with metrics on number of rocket launches, number of satellites and Starlink subscribers and gigawatts of compute delivered.

The challenge of making a complex business structure simple and accessible is not unique, however SpaceX faced a challenge unlike any other. And sentiment seems to be with them, as the interest in the transaction has yet to wane.

More is more – in some cases

In comms, “less is more” is an absolute, if not an edict. However, in SpaceX’s case, there are couple of areas where being comprehensive was beneficial and, perhaps, strategic. This is most evident in its list of risk factors. At 36 pages, SpaceX’s risk factors are extremely detailed and exhaustive. For a business for which so much is possible but unknown, there is credence to this approach as it shows transparency and an awareness of itself. There is, perhaps, an ulterior, strategic motive as well – burying the reader in information. Not in a nefarious sense, but in a postural one. As an aside, the mountain of risk factors incidentally did not mention that Elon Musk could present one himself.

This exhaustive approach to how a company tells its story is by no means a new standard, however it does show that there are different ways to go about structuring the story in a manner that most behooves the business in order to secure the desired outcome.

What is means for other AI IPOs?

While SpaceX does have a history of industry defining engineering, investors bought into the showing the power of storytelling. It will be very interesting to see how the likes of Anthropic and OpenAI approach the construction of their respective filings, as AI is such a nascent industry, so storytelling will be even more central.

SpaceX and its IPO is unlike any other. And the company and its team have certainly chosen numerous unconventional ways of approaching the run up to a listing. Yet, the proverbial hat must be tipped for the folks that spent copious hours developing a story that has captured the collective consciousness while propelling the transaction forward to become a resounding success.